Learn From Those Who
Know the Law

Meera has mentored more than 8,000 CLAT aspirants since 2014 and is the author of the Lawtest Legal Reasoning Handbook. A practising advocate at the Kerala High Court, she builds every class around live principle-and-fact drills taken from reported judgments rather than from textbook summaries.

She heads the legal reasoning curriculum from our Kochi campus, runs the Saturday doubt clinic for the CLAT 2026 batch, and has coached over forty students into an all-India rank inside the top 500.

Ananya writes the full-length CLAT mocks and the sectional papers that follow them, and she reads the attempt data before she reads the score. Her classes are built around what the analytics show — the questions a batch skipped, the ones it got wrong quickly, and the ones it spent four minutes on and still lost.

She runs the post-mock debrief for every CLAT batch and maintains the accuracy-versus-attempt dashboards students use to plan the next fortnight.

Arjun served as a district judge before moving to full-time teaching, and he marks Mains scripts the way he once wrote judgments — provision first, reasoning second, conclusion last. Students in his batch submit an answer every week and get it back with the marking scheme attached.

He designs the Judiciary Mains answer-writing programme and leads the weekly interview-preparation panel for candidates who have cleared Prelims.

Anitha teaches the open-book paper as an open-book paper: her sessions are as much about locating a provision inside the bare Act in under ninety seconds as they are about knowing it. She has tracked every AIBE paper since AIBE XII and rebuilds the question bank after each one.

She heads the AIBE programme and writes the annotated bare-Act indexes that candidates carry into the exam hall.

Vikram still argues civil suits every week, and he teaches procedure from the file rather than from the section list — a plaint, the written statement it drew, and the order that followed. Candidates leave his classes able to say what happens next in a matter, not just what the provision reads.

He handles CPC and Contract Law across the Judiciary Prelims batches and runs the fortnightly problem-question workshop.

Nandit teaches constitutional law through the cases that changed the doctrine, and he expects students to be able to state the ratio of each in two sentences before they touch a commentary. His notes on the basic-structure line of cases are used across both the AIBE and CLAT batches.

He also writes the constitutional-law section of the Lawtest question bank and reviews every new AIBE paper the week it is released.

Fathima built the current-affairs compendium that the CLAT and Judiciary batches revise from, and she teaches comprehension as a reading habit rather than a question type — a passage a day, argued out loud, before anyone looks at the options.

She runs the daily editorial-analysis session and edits the monthly current-affairs digest.

Rohit teaches reasoning as argument structure — find the conclusion, name the assumption, then look at the options. Students in his batch learn to mark the premise and conclusion on the paper itself before they read a single answer choice.

He handles logical and critical reasoning across the CLAT batches and sets the reasoning section of every full-length mock.